468

Check out attorney Knicole Emanuel’s recent blog post, written to wound care practitioners, “Medicare Auditors Are Not Wound Care Specialists: Why Providers Win Appeals When the Full Story Finally Gets Read”! Her post reinforces the reports I am hearing, that practitioners get what seem to be “rubber stamp denials” of CTP/skin substitute charges all the way to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), a process that can take years.

Remember, however, that you can only win on appeal if the necessary documentation is in the chart. Also remember that a very long progress note containing all sorts of statements about care rendered (e.g., “adequate compression was provided for 4 weeks…“) won’t help you if the rest of the chart does not support those assertions.

Also, keep in mind that auditors are “following the money,” since they have a financial reason to do so. While I have no way of proving it, auditors seem to have particularly targeted practitioners who used large pieces of high-priced amniotics. This makes sense from the standpoint of “return on investment” – from the auditor’s perspective. They only need to audit one or two cases to deny millions of dollars in claims. We will have to wait to find out if the audits will lessen now that the new pricing structure has dramatically decreased the monetary incentive for audits. 

Caroline


Related posts:

The opinions, comments, and content expressed or implied in my statements are solely my own and do not necessarily reflect the position or views of Intellicure or any of the boards on which I serve.